Energy & Carbon Footprint Tracking in AI
Reading time: 5 min
Why Measure Carbon Footprint in AI?
Carbon footprint refers to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused by an activity. In machine learning, large-scale model training consumes significant energy, contributing to emissions.
Why Track Energy & Emissions?
- AI’s Environmental Impact – Large ML models require high computational power, leading to increased energy consumption.
- Optimization & Efficiency – Identifying high-energy-consuming functions helps optimize and reduce resource waste.
- Regulatory & Compliance Needs – Researchers, businesses, and policymakers aim to quantify AI’s carbon impact.
- Cost Reduction – Efficient energy usage leads to lower operational costs.
Measuring AI’s energy consumption allows better optimization, improved sustainability, and transparency in reporting emissions.
How is Carbon Footprint Measured?
Measuring the carbon footprint of AI involves two main steps:
-
Energy Consumption Measurement Tools like CodeCarbon use hardware sensors—such as Intel RAPL for CPUs and NVIDIA NVML for GPUs—to track power usage. We integrate power over time (kWh) to determine the total energy consumed during model training or inference.
-
Carbon Emissions Calculation The total energy (in kWh) is multiplied by the regional carbon intensity (gCO₂/kWh) to estimate emissions using the formula:
Total CO₂ Emissions = Energy (kWh) × Carbon Intensity (gCO₂/kWh)Where:
- Energy = Sum of hardware power usage over runtime
- Carbon Intensity = Grid emission factor for the region
For example, the Regional Carbon Intensity fetches location-based CO₂ per kWh data from public sources (e.g., Ember Climate). It can auto-detect cloud provider regions (AWS, Azure, GCP) or use user-provided location.
📌 Quick Reference to Energy/Carbon Tracking Tools
Below is a high-level comparison of popular open-source tools for measuring energy consumption and carbon footprint in machine learning workloads.
| Tool | Measurement Level | Compatibility | Ease of Use | Installation | Real-Time Monitoring? | License | Docs & Support | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CentML DeepView | Code + model level, predicts usage on different GPUs/clouds | Most GPUs, cloud providers | Intuitive UI, runs in IDE (VSCode) | VSCode plugin | ✅ Inline monitoring, interactive UI | Apache 2.0 (Free) | GitHub Repo | Best for real-time analysis in VSCode |
| AIPowerMeter | Function-level CPU/GPU (Intel CPU only, GPU not always covered) | Intel processors (no guarantee for GPUs) | Requires experiment setup | Script to install | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | Free | Docs | Best for CPU-centric measurement |
| CarbonAI | Function-level monitoring | Most platforms | Requires code instrumentation | Python package | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | Free | GitHub Repo | Simple setup, minimal overhead |
| CarbonTracker | Code-level usage (Nvidia GPU, Intel CPU, Slurm, Colab, Jupyter) | Nvidia GPU, Intel CPU, HPC platforms | Requires code annotations | Python package | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | MIT License (Free) | GitHub Repo | Good for ML workflows in HPC |
| CodeCarbon | Hardware-level (GPU + CPU + RAM) + regional carbon intensity | Online/Offline tracking supported | Requires experiment setup | Python package | 📊 Dashboard after execution | Free | GitHub Repo | Supports regional carbon intensity |
| Eco2AI | Function-level CPU/GPU + region-based emission coefficient | Most platforms | Requires experiment setup | Python package | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | Apache 2.0 (Free) | GitHub Repo | Similar to CodeCarbon, with function-level insights |
| experiment-impact-tracker | Function-level measurement | Linux, MacOS (Nvidia GPU & Intel CPU) | Requires code instrumentation | Python package | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | Free | GitHub Repo | Best for tracking on HPC clusters |
| Powermeter | GPU-level (Nvidia-only) | Nvidia GPUs | Requires code instrumentation | Python package | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | Free | (GitHub repo not well maintained) | Focused purely on Nvidia GPU tracking |
| PyJoules | Machine-level monitoring | Linux-only (no MacOS support) | Requires code instrumentation | Python package | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | MIT License (Free) | GitHub Repo | Good for system-wide tracking |
| Tracarbon | Device-level CPU/GPU + region-based emission | Mac, Linux, AWS | Requires code instrumentation | Python package | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | Apache 2.0 (Free) | (GitHub repo available, active dev.) | Good for Mac & AWS |
| Zeus | Function-level measurement + optimization | Not specified | Requires code instrumentation | Python package | ❌ No real-time (post-run results) | Apache 2.0 (Free) | (GitHub repo available) | Offers additional energy optimizations |
🎯 Which Tool Should You Choose?
- ✅ For real-time monitoring:
- CentML DeepView (best for VSCode users, interactive UI)
- 🖥️ If you need CPU energy tracking:
- AIPowerMeter (Intel CPU), PyJoules
- ⚡ If you want region-based emissions tracking:
- CodeCarbon, Eco2AI, Tracarbon
- 🖥️ If you're running on HPC / Nvidia GPUs:
- CarbonTracker, experiment-impact-tracker, Powermeter
- 🔍 For GPU-only tracking:
- Powermeter (Nvidia-only), Zeus
🌱 Final Thoughts
Tracking energy consumption and carbon footprint in AI/ML workloads is becoming increasingly important for:
- Sustainability & Green AI initiatives
- Cost-effective resource management
- Improved algorithmic efficiency & optimization
- Transparency & compliance with sustainability goals
Researchers, engineers, and businesses can actively monitor and even reduce the carbon impact of AI using , while making their models more efficient and cost-effective.
References & Useful Links
- Intel RAPL Documentation
- NVIDIA NVML Library
- Ember Data on Grid Emissions
- CodeCarbon GitHub Repository
